Check the status of existing agreements with a vendor across all connected systems — CLM, CRM, email, and document storage — with gap analysis and upcoming deadlines. Use when onboarding or renewing a vendor, when you need a consolidated view of what's signed and what's missing (MSA, DPA, SOW), or when checking for approaching expirations and surviving obligations.
Instructions your experts follow when using this skill.
Packaging adaptation by AutoGPT, 2026-09-25. Original authorship and licence are retained. Changes are limited to the recorded name, metadata and file references; see ATTRIBUTION.md in this skill package.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see .
Check the status of existing agreements with a vendor across all connected systems. Provides a consolidated view of the legal relationship.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Agreement status reports should be verified against original documents by qualified legal professionals.
/vendor-check [vendor name]
If no vendor name is provided, prompt the user to specify which vendor to check.
Accept the vendor name from the user. Handle common variations:
Ask the user to clarify if the vendor name is ambiguous.
Search for the vendor across all available connected systems, in priority order:
Search for all contracts involving the vendor:
Search for the vendor/account record:
Search for recent relevant correspondence:
Search for:
Search for recent mentions:
For each agreement found, report:
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Agreement Type | NDA, MSA, SOW, DPA, SLA, License Agreement, etc. |
| Status | Active, Expired, In Negotiation, Pending Signature |
| Effective Date | When the agreement started |
| Expiration Date | When it expires or renews |
| Auto-Renewal | Yes/No, with renewal term and notice period |
| Key Terms | Liability cap, governing law, termination provisions |
| Amendments | Any amendments or addenda on file |
Identify what agreements exist and what might be missing:
## Agreement Coverage
[CHECK] NDA -- [status]
[CHECK/MISSING] MSA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] DPA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] SOW(s) -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] SLA -- [status or "Not found"]
[CHECK/MISSING] Insurance Certificate -- [status or "Not found"]
Flag any gaps that may be needed based on the relationship type (e.g., if there is an MSA but no DPA and the vendor handles personal data).
Output a consolidated report:
## Vendor Agreement Status: [Vendor Name]
**Search Date**: [today's date]
**Sources Checked**: [list of systems searched]
**Sources Unavailable**: [list of systems not connected, if any]
## Relationship Overview
**Vendor**: [full legal name]
**Relationship Type**: [vendor/partner/customer/etc.]
**CRM Status**: [if available]
## Agreement Summary
### [Agreement Type 1] -- [Status]
- **Effective**: [date]
- **Expires**: [date] ([auto-renews / does not auto-renew])
- **Key Terms**: [summary of material terms]
- **Location**: [where the executed copy is stored]
### [Agreement Type 2] -- [Status]
[etc.]
## Gap Analysis
[What's in place vs. what may be needed]
## Upcoming Actions
- [Any approaching expirations or renewal deadlines]
- [Required agreements not yet in place]
- [Amendments or updates that may be needed]
## Notes
[Any relevant context from email/chat searches]
If key systems are not connected via MCP:
Always clearly state which sources were checked and which were not, so the user knows the completeness of the report.
Files installed alongside these instructions.
When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates `.agents/product-marketing.md` that all other skills reference for product, audience, and positioning context.
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.