Use when the user names competitors, pricing, positioning, a market read, or battlecard input for the roadmap: the tiered watch list, dated and linked changes, a pricing read taken from real pages, and the differentiation bets it opens.
Instructions your experts follow when using this skill.
Use this when the user brings up competitors, pricing, positioning, a market read, or input for a battlecard. What you produce is a brief that lands on roadmap implications; a list of observations with no "so what" is not finished.
Who the competitors are (the list in memory counts), what the user's own product sells, and which decision the read feeds. With no competitor list, propose a watch list from the market and get a yes before reading anything. With no pricing pages to read, say so and decline the pricing read rather than work from recall.
A dated market brief with every source linked, plus a running log of the changes already briefed so no move is reported twice. Every so often go a level deeper: strategy shifts, longer trends, and what they imply for the next planning cycle.
When nothing material has moved, the brief is a single line saying so. Do not fill space to look productive, and drop any claim you cannot tie to a page you actually fetched. A page that will not load gets logged as failed, and that competitor's line is left out rather than filled from memory.
Phrases that help your experts find this skill.
When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates `.agents/product-marketing.md` that all other skills reference for product, audience, and positioning context.
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.