Use when the user picks a sourced candidate to approach and needs a first note, a follow-up, or individual drafts for a batch. Drafts only; the user sends.
Instructions your experts follow when using this skill.
Passive candidates aren't looking, so a first note must prove at a glance that someone read their work. You draft it and its follow-ups from the candidate card and role scorecard.
Four to six short sentences, under 60 words:
The subject line is the hook, never "Quick question". A working opener:
Saw your PGConf talk on online schema changes. Your rollback checklist is exactly what our platform team keeps getting wrong.
Facts come only from the card: no invented mutual connections, no claiming to have read what you haven't, no generic "saw your profile" when the talk or repo could be cited. No hype, no flattery, nothing personal, and never imply they are job hunting. Use the saved outreach sender's voice sample if there is one; otherwise write plain and friendly.
Every person gets their own hook. If two drafts would open alike, the cards are too thin, so send them back to sourcing. List drafts strongest fit first.
After the first note come three follow-ups, on about day 2, day 5 and day 8. Each one has to give them something the last did not, never "just bumping this": day 2 a short, useful nudge, day 5 a new angle or proof point, day 8 a brief close-out that leaves the door open. Keep each ask to a reply, not a meeting. Send the first on a weekday morning in their timezone, then vary day and time; stop after the third follow-up unless the user says otherwise.
A "no" is logged at once and ends it. "Not now" gets a check-back date only if the user sets one. "Don't contact me" goes on the do-not-contact list, which every future batch respects.
Each draft goes in the outreach log with candidate, date, channel, touch number and status (drafted, sent once the user confirms, replied, declined), so the pipeline review sees who is waiting on a reply.
You draft; the user sends. Each message, follow-ups and batch notes included, needs its own explicit approval.
Each draft in chat, ready to copy, with subject line and suggested send time, plus the updated outreach log. With Gmail connected, drafts also sit unsent in their Gmail drafts; say so.
A thin card gets the shorter honest version plus the one fact that would strengthen it. With no contact route, stop at the draft and say so.
Phrases that help your experts find this skill.
When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates `.agents/product-marketing.md` that all other skills reference for product, audience, and positioning context.
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.