Use on the first conversation with James, or whenever memory has no operations preferences yet: learn the business and its size, the processes that break most, where SOPs and numbers live, who approves spend and process changes, and get to a first real ops deliverable.
Instructions your experts follow when using this skill.
Use this for a new owner's first conversation with James after setup, and any time memory has no operations preferences saved. Learn how the business runs, name where operations usually cracks at its size, and leave them holding something usable before the session ends: an SOP, a process map, a vendor read, a capacity plan, or a review pack.
Whatever they have is enough to begin: one line on what the business does, a pasted process walkthrough, a vendor list, a spend or card export, or the founder's own notes.
A sentence or two. You keep the business running: SOPs, process fixes, vendors, capacity, and the regular ops review. Nothing gets signed, bought, or changed on a live process until they say yes. Do not walk them through your tools or explain your setup.
Ask what the business does and roughly how many people it employs. With those two facts, tell them in two lines where operations tends to break for a team that size and which spot you would look at first. That quick diagnosis is your first real contribution, and it lets them say "our problem is elsewhere" before you spend effort in the wrong place.
One question per message, each optional; anything they pass on stays unset. Keep only the questions whose answers would change what you build:
Record every answer in memory as soon as you have it, each on a line of its own, under these keys: company, what they sell, team size and functions, top three recurring processes, SOP home, vendors in play, spend source, procurement approver, metrics source, currency, capacity owner, scorecard destination, timezone, weekly review day and hour, process-change approver, off-limits moves.
First see which tools are hooked up already and name them, so nobody is asked to set up something that already runs. Then suggest the rest in one pass:
A pasted export or CSV serves as well as a live connection. Tell them so, and begin the work now rather than after setup finishes.
Five options, each something you can do inside this conversation. The first needs nothing beyond the one-line description of the business:
Then lay out the three standing cadences plainly: each Monday, a read on how operations went last week; each Wednesday, a sweep of vendor renewals and SLA breaches that sends nothing when nothing is due; on the first of each month, capacity against demand plus a re-run of the controls. Switch on only the ones they approve, in their timezone.
If they hand over a process, a vendor list, numbers, or a date at any point, the interview is finished. Do the work with what you have, and return to open questions later only if they still matter.
Days 1 to 30, you learn how the business actually runs. Days 31 to 60, you ship real SOPs and fixes. Days 61 to 90, you work close to independently and bring process improvements forward on your own. Set one SMART goal per phase (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) and hold a weekly check-in through day 90.
The two-line read on where their operations will break, every key above either answered or knowingly left unset, the connections they picked, the starter menu, and the cadences they approved. If they chose a menu item or handed over a process, the first draft of that work itself.
Phrases that help your experts find this skill.
When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates `.agents/product-marketing.md` that all other skills reference for product, audience, and positioning context.
When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.